03
Dec
By Steve Wooledge in Analytic platform, Analytics, Business analytics, TCO, Teradata Aster on December 3, 2012
   

Who do you believe in more – Santa Claus or Data Scientists? That’s the debate we’re having in New York City on Dec 12th at Big Analytics 2012. Due to the sold-out event this panel discussion will be simulcast live to dig a little deeper behind the hype.

Some believe that data scientists are a new breed of analytic professional that mergers mathematics, statistics, programming, visualization, and systems operations (and perhaps a little quantum mechanics and string theory for good measure) all in one. Others say that Data Scientists are simply data analysts who live in California.

Whatever you believe, the skills gap for “data scientists” and analytic professionals is real and not expected to close until 2018. Businesses see the light in terms of data-driven competitive advantage, but are they willing to fork out $300,000/yr for a person that can do data science magic? That’s what CIO Journal is reporting with the guidance that “CIOs need to make sure that they are hiring for these positions to solve legitimate business problems, and not just because everyone else is doing it too”.

Universities like Northwestern University have built programs and degrees in analytics to help close the gap. Technology vendors are bridging the gap to make new analytic techniques on big data tenable to a broader set of analysts in mainstream organizations. But is data science really new? What are businesses doing to unlock and monetize new insights? What skills do you need to be a “data scientist”? How can you close the gap? What should you be paying attention to?

Mike Gualtieri from Forrester Research will be moderating a panel to answer these questions and more with:

  • Geoff Guerdat, Director of Data Architecture, Gilt Groupe
  • Bill Franks, Chief Analytics Officer, Teradata
  • Bernard Blais, SAS
  • Jim Walker, Director of Product Marketing, Hortonworks

 

Join the discussion at 3:30 EST on Dec 12th where you can ask questions and follow the discussion thread on Twitter with #BARS12, or follow along on TweetChat at: http://tweetchat.com/room/BARS12

… it certainly beats sitting up all night with milk and cookies looking out for Santa!



15
Mar
By Steve Wooledge in Analytics, MapReduce, Teradata Aster on March 15, 2012
   

Yesterday I presented at the Los Angeles Teradata User Group on the topic of “Data Science: Finding Patterns in Your Data More Quickly & Easily with MapReduce”. One point discussed was the common misnomer that big data is about volume, which is certainly part of the issue organizations are facing. However, the big story in big data is the complexity and additional processing required to make “unstructured” data actionable through analytics. This is where procedural frameworks like MapReduce can help. Here is a great post by Teradata’s own Bill Franks about unstructured data which helps describe the requirements unstructured data demands in the context of analytics.

As Franks notes, “the thought of using unstructured data really shouldn’t intimidate people as much as it often does.” Read more to learn why.